<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Declaring Rights and Limited Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/comment-page-1/#comment-10287</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=601#comment-10287</guid>
		<description>Chris - thanks again for the link. I&#039;ve since added your blog on mine as well.

Best,
RGW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; thanks again for the link. I&#8217;ve since added your blog on mine as well.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
RGW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/comment-page-1/#comment-10232</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=601#comment-10232</guid>
		<description>Pam:

It is also a denial of absolutes. That judicial philosophy allows the courts to &quot;bend interpretation&quot; to fit whatever current social mores are fashionable, instead of going through the (intentionally) long and difficult amendment process. 

The Founders allowed for the Constitution to be amended so it could adapt to changing societal needs. But they intended it to be a difficult process so that amendments would be thoroughly debated and examined before changing the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam:</p>
<p>It is also a denial of absolutes. That judicial philosophy allows the courts to &#8220;bend interpretation&#8221; to fit whatever current social mores are fashionable, instead of going through the (intentionally) long and difficult amendment process. </p>
<p>The Founders allowed for the Constitution to be amended so it could adapt to changing societal needs. But they intended it to be a difficult process so that amendments would be thoroughly debated and examined before changing the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/comment-page-1/#comment-10230</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=601#comment-10230</guid>
		<description>I am afraid that the new administration will justify almost any action my proclaiming that our Constitution is a &quot;living&quot; document.  The problem with &quot;living&quot; things is that they can die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am afraid that the new administration will justify almost any action my proclaiming that our Constitution is a &#8220;living&#8221; document.  The problem with &#8220;living&#8221; things is that they can die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard G. Williams, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/comment-page-1/#comment-10229</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard G. Williams, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=601#comment-10229</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris - thanks! But where is your roll, I can&#039;t seem to find it? I&#039;ll be happy to reciprocate!

&quot;I see a national government that started to down this path with Bush in office and Republicans in Congress.&quot;

No disagreement here.

I love reading the Founders - their words are so inspirational and prophetic. 

Best,
RGW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris &#8211; thanks! But where is your roll, I can&#8217;t seem to find it? I&#8217;ll be happy to reciprocate!</p>
<p>&#8220;I see a national government that started to down this path with Bush in office and Republicans in Congress.&#8221;</p>
<p>No disagreement here.</p>
<p>I love reading the Founders &#8211; their words are so inspirational and prophetic. </p>
<p>Best,<br />
RGW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/comment-page-1/#comment-10210</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=601#comment-10210</guid>
		<description>Richard, first, I added your blog to the roll, I can&#039;t believe I did not have it listed. My apologies!!

I see a national government that started to down this path with Bush in office and Republicans in Congress.

Indeed, it&#039;s hard to argue that the Democrats are not taking us even further down the road to a less democratic and certainly they are targeting our open/free market system.

As far as the Founders. You&#039;re probably right that they can still speak to us today. I&#039;m trying to put today in perspective with the past and without doing so by using presentism.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, first, I added your blog to the roll, I can&#8217;t believe I did not have it listed. My apologies!!</p>
<p>I see a national government that started to down this path with Bush in office and Republicans in Congress.</p>
<p>Indeed, it&#8217;s hard to argue that the Democrats are not taking us even further down the road to a less democratic and certainly they are targeting our open/free market system.</p>
<p>As far as the Founders. You&#8217;re probably right that they can still speak to us today. I&#8217;m trying to put today in perspective with the past and without doing so by using presentism.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard G. Williams, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/comment-page-1/#comment-10202</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard G. Williams, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=601#comment-10202</guid>
		<description>Chris:

&quot;Some are arguing that our government is transforming not only the economic structure but the constitutional structure of our country. I cannot say for sure where I stand at this moment.&quot;

I would say it&#039;s quite clear what&#039;s going on. Part of what we&#039;re seeing is Obama&#039;s socialist tendencies and part is the economic crisis that is enabling the Federal government to take advantage of the crisis in terms of grabbing power, which is the  natural inclination of all governments. That natural inclination is what the Founders&#039; feared and why we have the checks and balances, the Constitution, and federalism. It is the most brilliant means of governance ever devised. 

&quot;Can the Founders really teach us anything about today and would they even want us to try?&quot;

I would say emphatically yes! Though methods and technology change, certain principles are eternal. I think the Founders knew this and, though imperfectly, sought to make those principles foundational in our country&#039;s birth and expected those principles to be passed to subsequent generations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris:</p>
<p>&#8220;Some are arguing that our government is transforming not only the economic structure but the constitutional structure of our country. I cannot say for sure where I stand at this moment.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would say it&#8217;s quite clear what&#8217;s going on. Part of what we&#8217;re seeing is Obama&#8217;s socialist tendencies and part is the economic crisis that is enabling the Federal government to take advantage of the crisis in terms of grabbing power, which is the  natural inclination of all governments. That natural inclination is what the Founders&#8217; feared and why we have the checks and balances, the Constitution, and federalism. It is the most brilliant means of governance ever devised. </p>
<p>&#8220;Can the Founders really teach us anything about today and would they even want us to try?&#8221;</p>
<p>I would say emphatically yes! Though methods and technology change, certain principles are eternal. I think the Founders knew this and, though imperfectly, sought to make those principles foundational in our country&#8217;s birth and expected those principles to be passed to subsequent generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/comment-page-1/#comment-10171</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=601#comment-10171</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nate, I fixed that typo.  How embarrassing for me. Anyway, I will check out David&#039;s book!
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nate, I fixed that typo.  How embarrassing for me. Anyway, I will check out David&#8217;s book!<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/05/declaring-rights-and-limited-government/comment-page-1/#comment-10167</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=601#comment-10167</guid>
		<description>The Constitutional Convention was in 1787, not 1789.  My friend David Stewart has written a good book about it entitled &quot;The Summer of 1787&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitutional Convention was in 1787, not 1789.  My friend David Stewart has written a good book about it entitled &#8220;The Summer of 1787&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

