<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best of the Best in World War 2 Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog4history.com/2009/06/good-world-war-2-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/06/good-world-war-2-books/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james smith</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/06/good-world-war-2-books/comment-page-1/#comment-12680</link>
		<dc:creator>james smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=607#comment-12680</guid>
		<description>Nagorski&#039;s book about the massive Moscow Battle is long overdue.  I too have been to Russia and met veterans who believed firmly that they had done &#039; the business&#039; with Hitler.  Looking thru the book critically I thought two things;
1/ Generaloberst Hoth is not mentioned and yet, the Vyazma Battle (which was enormous) was largely set up by his north/center  Panzergruppe. By relying on Guderian all the time, the commentary is not as balanced as Stolfi...Guderian was south of Moscow and that makes one heck of a difference in the world&#039;s biggest country!
2/ As I read it, immediately after Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt called in his advisors and one of them (Commander King) was very prophetic about the events in Moscow.  As I heard it, King said that Japan was the USA&#039;s problem and (amazingly) &#039;The Russians will do nine-tenths of the job with Hitler&#039;   ....looks to me as if he got it right; but why no mention in the book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nagorski&#8217;s book about the massive Moscow Battle is long overdue.  I too have been to Russia and met veterans who believed firmly that they had done &#8216; the business&#8217; with Hitler.  Looking thru the book critically I thought two things;<br />
1/ Generaloberst Hoth is not mentioned and yet, the Vyazma Battle (which was enormous) was largely set up by his north/center  Panzergruppe. By relying on Guderian all the time, the commentary is not as balanced as Stolfi&#8230;Guderian was south of Moscow and that makes one heck of a difference in the world&#8217;s biggest country!<br />
2/ As I read it, immediately after Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt called in his advisors and one of them (Commander King) was very prophetic about the events in Moscow.  As I heard it, King said that Japan was the USA&#8217;s problem and (amazingly) &#8216;The Russians will do nine-tenths of the job with Hitler&#8217;   &#8230;.looks to me as if he got it right; but why no mention in the book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/06/good-world-war-2-books/comment-page-1/#comment-10283</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=607#comment-10283</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post, and for noting that the scope of fighting on the eastern front was significantly greater than in western Europe.

As far as I know the best books on the eastern front war are by Prof. Erickson:  The Road to Stalingrad and The Road to Berlin.  Erickson had extensive access to Soviet records and generals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, and for noting that the scope of fighting on the eastern front was significantly greater than in western Europe.</p>
<p>As far as I know the best books on the eastern front war are by Prof. Erickson:  The Road to Stalingrad and The Road to Berlin.  Erickson had extensive access to Soviet records and generals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/06/good-world-war-2-books/comment-page-1/#comment-10280</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=607#comment-10280</guid>
		<description>Joel thanks for posting. I have  &quot;Armegeddon&quot; as well and it is very good.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel thanks for posting. I have  &#8220;Armegeddon&#8221; as well and it is very good.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.blog4history.com/2009/06/good-world-war-2-books/comment-page-1/#comment-10279</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog4history.com/?p=607#comment-10279</guid>
		<description>Excellent choices!  I just finished reading volume 1 of Atkinson&#039;s trilogy (I read vol. 2 a couple years ago) and he&#039;s an excellent writer.

Max Hastings is another great one.  You promoted &quot;Retribution&quot; a while back, which pushed it up my list.  You were right...very, very good.  I would mention his companion work &quot;Armageddon&quot;, covering the War&#039;s final year in Europe.

Other really good recent reads for me include Sloan&#039;s &quot;The Ultimate Battle&quot; and Donavan Webster&#039;s &quot;The Burma Road&quot;.

&quot;Heisenberg&#039;s War&quot; by Thomas Powers also deserves a look.

Not war-related, I&#039;m currently working through Chernow&#039;s biography of Alexander Hamilton.

Regards,
Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent choices!  I just finished reading volume 1 of Atkinson&#8217;s trilogy (I read vol. 2 a couple years ago) and he&#8217;s an excellent writer.</p>
<p>Max Hastings is another great one.  You promoted &#8220;Retribution&#8221; a while back, which pushed it up my list.  You were right&#8230;very, very good.  I would mention his companion work &#8220;Armageddon&#8221;, covering the War&#8217;s final year in Europe.</p>
<p>Other really good recent reads for me include Sloan&#8217;s &#8220;The Ultimate Battle&#8221; and Donavan Webster&#8217;s &#8220;The Burma Road&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Heisenberg&#8217;s War&#8221; by Thomas Powers also deserves a look.</p>
<p>Not war-related, I&#8217;m currently working through Chernow&#8217;s biography of Alexander Hamilton.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

