The History Channel Gets it Wrong: “Aftershock: Beyond The Civil War”

swamp_outlawsI got a chance tonight to catch a re-airing of the History Channel’s Aftershock: Beyond The Civil War. Though I enjoyed the documentary and as far as I can tell it did an excellent job establishing the general mood and conditions of the South and the state of continued violence that ravaged blacks, whites, and Indians, it did so by sensationalizing, and in at least one instance, flat out misrepresentation.

In a small region of North Carolina, a group of Indians and former slaves become bandits dedicated at first to steal from wealthy white plantation owners. The group was lead by Henry Berry Lowry, who became a legend and to this day is idealized as a kind of Robin Hood. According to the History Channel, Lowry was a freedom fighter who was inspired to wage war because of the brutal execution of his father and brother by KKK and Home Guard members out to intimidate innocent law abiding people. And though they were executed, it did not happen as dramatized by HC and nor were the actual circumstances even mentioned. In the scene depicted in the documentary, a group of Home Guard Southerns show up with rifles loaded, take aim at the helpless pair standing along a lonesome road, and fire away in a brutal scene of white racism and terror – which indeed happened time and again in the South during Reconstruction. However, this is not how this particular incident happened. Here is what really happened:

“On March 3, 1865, Allen Lowry and his son William were tried in a hastily organized sham court, declared guilty of theft, and executed in Robeson County. While William was almost certainly a member — and perhaps even the leader—of a gang that committed robberies, it is unlikely that the elderly Allen was involved in any raids. What is certain is that the two men’s deaths sparked North Carolina’s famous Lowry War, a seven-year period of raids, robberies, and murders.” [Jenny McElroy, "March 1865 — Executions Spark the Lowry War," This Month in North Carolina History, March 2008.]

The gang was indeed a kind of Robin Hood band, only they were not interested in helping the poor, freedom, or helping their neighbors. They were motivated by jealousy, and “the riches of their more affluent neighbors became too tempting for four of Allen Lowry’s sons…”

They were not freedom fighters, but as I understand it, gangsters who wanted to “Get Rich, or Die Try’n.” Kind of the 50 Cent of their time. They were, at their core, outlaws bent on revenge and plunder. However, the HC has decided to use their interesting and sensational story as a narrative device.

Tell us about history, show us dramatic recreations, just do it honestly. Just because the idea of the Lowry Gang being freedom fighters who steal from the evil racists Whites and give to the minority poor makes us feel better, does not mean it is a license to make fiction. There is plenty of examples of terror and terrorism by Whites, as properly shown in the HC‘s handling of the Ku Klux Klan in Tennessee and Arkansas. Stick to the facts HC, and stop sensationalizing history, stop Hollywoodizing your productions. You might lose some viewers who want HISTORY!

About admin

Travel and History blogger Twitter @JoeDuck
This entry was posted in American History, Civil War, Media, Memory. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The History Channel Gets it Wrong: “Aftershock: Beyond The Civil War”

  1. matt mckeon says:

    Isn’t this like Jesse James? Basically a criminal, but in a situation where he’s “one of us vs. them?”

  2. Chris – excellent post. Thanks for taking the time to set the record straight with some in-depth analysis and a dose of reality.

    Best wishes for a Merry Christmas to you and yours.

  3. Sean Kennedy says:

    I watched a show on history channel that blatantly said the Ben Franken doesn’t believe in God. They are wrong he did and I quote “[I believe] That there is one God, who made all things.
    That he governs the world by his providence.
    That he ought to be worshiped by adoration, prayer, and thanksgiving.
    But that the most acceptable service of God is doing good to man.
    That the soul is immortal.
    And that God will certainly reward virtue and punish vice, either here or hereafter.” $#@! THE HISTORY CHANNEL. Do you own research. ALL OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS LOVED GOD and the founding fathers believed in God=love and individual rights of freedom that GOD GAVE US (AMERICANS)….and humans in general.

  4. john keteyian says:

    They had a hit piece on Thomas Jefferson too. It stated he was a republican and that he didn’t believe in God. He founded the Democrat party and republicans weren’t around until the 1850’s. How can they get this wrong?

  5. Jim Jolly says:

    John – As you point out at the time political parties were vastly different then they are today. Jefferson’s party was in opposition to the Federalist party. Madison founded it in Philadelphia as the Republican party. He and Jefferson then team up and reach out to other political leaders to expand the influence of the party. During that period there were various names for the party one of which was Republican. However, this is NOT the forerunner of the Republican party of today which was created in 1854 from parts of the Whig party.

  6. Kimberly Locklear says:

    I enjoyed the part about the Lumbee people, I myself am Lumbee and was raised listening to stories of Henry Berry. Really it doesn’t matter how anyone else believes it happened, the truth is we are a people who fought for our rights and our way of life! I’m damn proud to be “LUMBEE”!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>