The Common Soldier of the Civil War Webcast

American Military University (AMU) along with the Weider History Group is offering a series of webcasts covering the American Civil War.

From the website:

Long after the guns had been silenced, the huge volumes of letters written by these Civil War “grunts” remain a window for viewing and contemplating what they thought, what they ate, how they were trained, their discipline, their equipment, and how they occupied their spare time. This webcast discussed the common soldier of the Civil War, including statistics about the troops, prewar occupations, motivating factors, weaponry, and the soldiers’ quotes that brought this presentation to life.

Tonight the second live webcast installment The Battle of Shiloh took place and featured Dr. Woodworth (Ph.D., Rice University, 1987) who is professor of history at American Military University and author, co-author, or editor of twenty-seven books, and who I have studied under.

The first webcast centered on The Common Soldier of the Civil War occurred last month.

A neat feature is that you can watch/listen to previous recorded webcast:

The Common Soldier of the Civil War Webcast from American Public University on Vimeo.

The third and final installment is in a couple weeks and features, rightly so, perhaps the most important battle of the war: The Battle of Gettysburg – Tuesday, May 18, 2010.

About admin

Travel and History blogger Twitter @JoeDuck
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Common Soldier of the Civil War Webcast

  1. Michael Schack says:

    Just asking some questions. Did the “common soldier ever ask questions why he was fighting for an economic system that kept his standard of living down? I ask this for at any time a builder, planter, and rail road builder could bring in slaves when workers asked for an increase in wages. Similar to the North there were ways to be exempted from the army. In the North $300 you could pay for a replacement. In the confederate states a planter wit 20 or more slaves did not have to join. Might the word Southerner and confederate not be always have the identical meaning?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>