The news today shook me to the core. A year or so ago when they cut off the head of Nicholas Berg radical fundamental Islam exposed itself once again. Today I feel the same way.
I’ve attempted, I feel, with great success to keep my personal beliefs and feelings removed from this meager blog. However, I feel I can no longer do this, especially in regard to the current war on radical Islamic fundamentalism. A war that so many believe is a farce created by people only interested in world domination and oil. You know, the West as the ultimate bad guy.
I know there are those who will in one breath condemn what has happened as today it was announced that the mangled remains of Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25, were found. And in another breath suggest that the United States (the Western world) has brought this down on itself. In a way we are responsible for some failures, no doubt. I say we have used too much restraint. I was already in a depressed mood after I read an Interview with Andrew Bacevich: The Arrogance of American Power over at the HNN.
He was asked:
TD: What about the Iraq War at present?
Bacevich: There are a couple of important implications that we have yet to confront. The war has exposed the limited depth of American military power. I mean, since the end of the Cold War we Americans have been beating our chests about being the greatest military power the world has ever seen. [His voice rises.] Overshadowing the power of the Third Reich! Overshadowing the Roman Empire!
We’ve been beating our chests? And I know there are many who believe this. First Bacevich contradicts himself. His premise is that we are arrogant and have attempted to subjugate the world. Yet we are not even the military equals of the Third Reich. Fine. I do not understand Bacevich and I know those who do will not understand me. It is our restraint that is getting us into trouble in Iraq. I was not in favor of going in, but it’s three years and it’s time to get it right. We are a nation, who at the height of our military production during WWII, could place more equipment and machines into battle than Germany, Japan and England combined. If we had cranked up the machine of war a few years ago, instituted the draft, and placed even just 25% more of our resources toward the effort in Iraq, we would have it under control by now. Our own military has reported that had we deployed several hundred thousand more troops the war would have been shorten and we would be on our way to withdrawal at this very time. However, we all know that it would have been a political nightmare to do such a thing.
The director of the Iraqi defense ministry, Maj. Gen. Abdul-Aziz Mohammed, said, “With great regret, they [the two soldiers] were killed in a barbaric way†after admitting that they showed signs of having been tortured. Does anyone remember the ideological makeup of Japanese soldiers indoctrinated under the tenants of Bushido? When Japan started industrializing during the second half of the 19th century it kept the belief system Bushido from its former warrior class the Samurai. Bushido was a way of life; it was about submission of body and soul. It held very strict rules for behavior and did not allow for much individual identification. It was an ideology. It helped them create a robotic military that could systematically execute orders and people. It helped them create the belief of cultural and racial superiority.
How many of us really even understand or know the basics of Islam? What is it based on? Here’s a quick refresher. The word “Islam†means to submit, more precisely, “submission to will of God.†To be a Muslim is to be one who submits to the word of God. The religion is founded in submission, which does not allow for a lot of freethinking. When you are told something by a caliph or respected holy person, you do it. I am not a deeply Christian person. I do not regularly attend church, as I believe that being a Christian is a way of life and has nothing to do with identifying myself with a sect. But I am very much concerned with those who try to pass off Islam as this piece loving religion. It is based on war and submission. It spread because of war and do not believe it for a moment if someone tries to tell you that the term “Jihad†has been “misunderstood.†It is all about a holy war. A warrior of a jihad who dies in battle is believed to enter an afterlife of “sensual paradise.†Though initially the founder of Islam (a prosperous Arab merchant, Muhammed) called for Christians to be treated with some level of respect as he considered them to only be “misguided†in their beliefs. However, if they tried to block the expansion of Islam they were to become targets of the Dar Ar-Harb (Adode of War). Jihads targeted all none-believers as it spread. Within a century of its founding in the 7th century, Islam “conquered†Persia, Egypt, and Syria. That was just the beginning.
Too often I hear people, even historians, call the Western world (America) nothing but a crusading nation. They even point to the Crusades as the beginning of Islam’s distrust and anger with the West. Anyone who has read or studied the Middle East and Islam would know that the Crusades were more than just wealthy Christians plundering religious holy lands. As a matter of fact, for years after the expulsion of Christians from Jerusalem Arab historians failed to give the events much notice. It meant little to them. Of course, you do know that the word “crusade†is a modern term as the real Crusaders never used the word. They saw themselves as pilgrims. Expert and historian Thomas F. Madden makes the point, “for western Europeans the crusades were epic struggles that helped fashion their image of themselves… [for] Muslims the crusades were hardly worthy of attention. As late as the seventeenth century the crusades remained virtually unknown in the Muslim world.†It doesn’t take a genius to figure out why. Yes the Crusaders could be brutal and there were slaughters. Both sides cut off plenty of heads. But Christianity has grown and developed a conscience that is missing from radical fundamental Islam. I’m not saying all of Islam. (See his book, “The New Concise History of the Crusades,†2005, preface.)
My ranting has spun off to the Crusades, but with good reason. Hopefully, you begin to see how we take and use history and distort it to fit our own needs. Certain aspects of the Muslim world since 9/11 have pointed back to the Crusades as some kind of justification for what is happening now. Or how about the deduction that we are simply on another Crusade today for oil or global domination. Let’s go back to Bacevich and his evoking of the Third Reich and Roman Empire as some kind of measuring stick for the United States today. I contend that of all the superpowers of world history, and we are one of them, that we have for the most part used our force only when provoked and have used it with much restraint.
My blog post today will probably be seen by some as nothing more than the ranting of a racist, paranoid, ignorant far right radical. Now if I stood up and called the United States arrogant, imperial, ignorant, and Christianity an evil institution, I would be hailed. Oh well.
But I have a final and more important point to make. I know that the argument is that we (Westerners) essentially created al-Qaeda. That via colonialism, racism, American hegemony, or our support for Israel, we have created the anger that the Middle East has for us. Al-Qaeda to many people was a natural reaction to our actions. As Victor Davis Hanson and many others have noted it is arguably the “widespread failure to adopt free institutions, democracy, open markets, and civilian audits†that have led to discontent among the masses in the Middle East. These same people whose lives are based on submission and inequality. But the fact is, al-Qaeda would be alive and kicking regardless. Case in point, Iraq. All that oil money yet the vast majority of the country lived in poverty or near the poverty level. Have you researched how far different Iraq was before Saddam? It is easy for radical fundamentalist groups to point to the wealthy U.S. and say, “Look, there’s your problem…†when in fact it is their very own making.
Finally, I’ll let the terrorists (radical Islam fundamentalism) speak for themselves:
“We give the good news … to the Islamic nation that we have carried God’s verdict by slaughtering the two captured crusaders,†said an Internet post which appeared on an Islamic militant Web site where insurgent groups regularly post statements and videos.
“With God Almighty’s blessing, Abu Hamza al-Muhajer carried out the verdict of the Islamic court.â€
I’m quite liberal, but don’t find your post racist at all. What I see is someone, who like a lot of us, is struggling to make sense with all that is going on. I have two disagreements, though.
The first is your assumption that “we have used our force only when provoked and have used it with much restraint.” If you look back at American foreign policy since the mid-1800′s, there are numerous examples of where our use of force was a matter of choice and the provocation was then manufactured to provide us with moral cover: see the subjugation of the Kingdom of Hawaii, destruction of Native American tribes, the Phillipines, Guatamala several times, etc. Our invasion of Iraq was a war of choice, not necessity.
The second point is that I think that your assumptions about why AlQaeda exists are over-simplified. A read of the occupation of Jerusalem during the First Crusade reveals out of control Christian warriors who massacred and disemoweled Muslims and Jews alike. Disembowement because soldiers were told that the Muslims had hidden their treasure in their stomachs. To paintall Muslims as x is as shallow in my view as basing my view of Christianity on the statements of the Pat Robertson. AQ in Iraq has killed hundreds of Iraqis and from my read of the facts, support for them is wafer thin.
Regardless, I enjoyed the read. It is refreshing to see well thought out writing which avoids the name-calling and vitriol.
I appreciate your post. I do want to make clear, and maybe I was not, that I in NO way do I wish to mark all Muslims as “X.” I have the same feelings towards radical Christians, who are different than myself though I am a Christian. I do not support any ideology that takes something to the extreme. We have several World Wars and millions dead due to radicalism in belief systems, which is what I am focused on above. Thanks again for your comments. I promise everyone tomorrow I’ll get back to some interesting Civil War stuff I have been working on!
Hi Chris, — I generally enjoy your posts, but this one seems to have little to do with history and everything to do with an emotional rant in the direction of Islam. To say that Islam can be understood as a religion based on “war and submission” has absolutely nothing to do with history. Those are your words. Are their groups/sects that interpret Islam in a “radical” way, well of course. But is this any different from periods in the history of Christianity? Exactly what interpretation of the Koran are you basing this on? Come to think of it, have you ever even opened the book? Which Suras are you referring to?
One final point: I lost my 34 yr old cousin on 9/11 and as you can imagine I was incredibly emotional in the days and weeks to follow, but as a teacher it is incumbent on me to remain rational and not disseminate unqualified generalizations that pick out an entire group.
Kevin thanks for your comment. Your blog is a daily stop for me.
However I, of course, disagree that my post has little to do with history. In part, it deals with historical interpretation and how people use the past to manipulate it to fit their agenda. Christianity I’m sure has done the same.
Additionally, I make it clear I am not saying “all†of Islam. I posted a follow-up to Wieland’s first response making this clear. The Pillars of Islam speak to peaceful rituals that should never alarm anyone, but then we come to the jihad.
No I have never read the Quran in its entirety. I have read parts as quoted in books. My knowledge is exclusively from respected historians – Albert Hourani’s “A History of the Arab Peoples†for one. I stated facts that do not require I read the Quran.
Lets review those facts: “Those who SUBMITTED to his [Allah] will came to be known as Muslims… Islam, is derived from the same linguistic root.†Added to the Pillars is “a general injunction to strive in the way of God (jihad), which might have a wide meaning or a more precise one: to FIGHT in order to extend the bounds of Islam.†(p. 16-17, 66, Albert Hourani’s “A History of the Arab Peoples.â€) Submission and War.
Since the Crusades, which was a term not even used at the time, Christianity (though by no means a perfect religion) has developed to allow for freewill, individual liberty and expression. Islam by and large has remained stagnant, ultra-conservative, and that is a huge reason for the current state of affairs in the Middle East and in the world. But this is something that is almost never discussed in the media and I suspect most teachers do not bring these points up as well. It’s called cultural relativism and unfortunately too many teachers believe in it. It’s also more politically correct and less obtrusive to blame it all on imperialism, American hegemony, and Israel and I understand that.
Radical Islamic fundamentalism, which if it does not dominate throughout the Middle East it is certainly growing, is hindering a majority of Muslims from personal liberty, freedoms, and simple decent standards of living. This has led to the development and growth of terrorists groups. Not exclusively, but it plays a role and we could argue on and on about how much or little.
War and submission are most certainly a part of the history Islam. War and submission is one big reason why religions (including Christianity at certain times in history) have spread and dominated from one place and time to the next, and my point is that Islam is no different. That is all.
A democratic Middle East would mean a better and safer world. There is a significant reason why so many radical Islamic groups are sending thousands of jihadists into Iraq, and that is the thought of a democracy gaining a foothold there and what that would mean.
Kevin I failed to respond to your final comment, ” …as a teacher it is incumbent on me to remain rational and not disseminate unqualified generalizations that pick out an entire group.”
I am trying not to take this the wrong way. I don’t know if you are calling me out, or simply making a general statement? I say this with all respect, but I think I know what you’re saying.
First, my comments are not “disseminate unqualified generalizations,” they are facts. I ask you to defend that statement and show how I am wrong! Second, I was VERY clear about who I was speaking to, “radical Islamic fundamentalists.” I only said it a half-dozen times. If you want to defend that “entire group,” go ahead. Thirdly, my post was very rational and I will admit I had some emotion to it as well. I suspect if I discredited the United States and placed all blame on it, condemned it, you’d suddenly find me very rational. Am I wrong? I think you reacted to my post with some emotion of your own.
Chris, — I was definitely not “calling you out” but your post still rings more emotion than anything that would count as analytical. Again, you made the very clear point that Islam is based on “war and submission.” Now that seems to me to be an “unqualified generalization.” At the same time you asked your reader not to make the mistake of reducing American foreign policy to oil. Isn’t there a double-standard here. No, I would not claim you are rational if you “discredited the United States and placed all blame on it” because that would be a ridiculous claim. I just finished Francis Fukuyama’s _America at the Crossroads_ and Amartya Sen’s _Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny_, both of which I found to be helpful in trying to see the world and American foreign policy in a more sophisticated manner.
I think the problem I had is that your post seemed to me to teeter between outright generalizations and some qualifications. Perhaps I just interpreted you incorrectly.